Home » Artist Profiles »Features » Currently Reading:

Blur: the Hyde Park aftermath

July 8, 2009 Artist Profiles, Features 9 Comments
Blur at Hyde Park

Blur at Hyde Park

In the final few weeks of 2008, something unexpected happened. Yes, it had been mooted and thrown around as a rumour for quite some time, but nobody was really sure if it would ever actually come about. Then it did: with sepia-toned photographs of Damon Albarn and Graham Coxon, entwined and grinning, splashed across an NME feature, Blur reformed.

Maybe it wasn’t such an amazing feat after all; Take That and the Spice Girls had set the trend, and Blur’s bassist Alex James had strongly hinted that a reunion was on the cards. It still felt incredibly special though, especially after Coxon and Albarn’s major success with their solo interests had seemed to take them in very different directions. While Coxon veered from the punk-inspired riffage of his 2004-era solo work towards a Nick Drake-style folk in 2009, Albarn built on the foundations of his work as an ethnomusicologist in Africa, developed the innovative Gorillaz project and teamed up with legendary musicians for The Good The Bad & The Queen (2007). Just how would the men behind ‘Parklife’ and ‘Country House’ find a way to meet back in the middle?

On a personal note, Blur were the first “proper” band that mattered to me. Like most 10-year-old girls in 1996, I was enthralled by The Spice Girls but hit a sort of zenith when I belatedly discovered Blur by way of Parklife (1994). Its catchy pop hooks are a draw for anyone who’s a sucker for a good tune but it was the quirks that really grabbed my attention: the stand-alone melancholy of the brass intro to ‘Badhead’, the hypnotic bass drum beats in ‘Girls and Boys’ and the squeal of computer games in ‘Jubilee’. Blur grabbed me in a way that other guitar groups never quite did and there the love affair began, never to be put asunder; a few years ago I wrote my university dissertation on Albarn’s work with Gorillaz, much to the chagrin of my Handel-loving lecturers.

Technically, Blur never split up; like childhood sweethearts, they simply grew apart. It’s easy to see how Coxon became disillusioned with Blur’s new direction on the ever cathartic 13 (1999), especially considering that the previous record Blur (1997) was widely hailed as “Graham’s album” thanks to its rockier and fuzzier presentation.

The central spectacle was soon revealed: a homecoming gig in London’s Hyde Park and their first live show for six years. Those of us who waited with baited breath and hovering cursors for the presale tickets thought we were going to be the lucky few who witnessed the reformation (give or take 50,000 others). Then a glut of other gigs trickled into being: a second Hyde Park date, a small nationwide tour and headline slots at Glastonbury and T in The Park. Were Blur going to end up diluting the effect or punching home the meaning?

I should have been rapturous, having won the chance to see my favourite band with a full roll call (at Leeds Festival 2003 they played without Coxon). Yet instead of being excited beyond belief I got a weird feeling about the whole thing. Coxon told The Sun that he wanted to play songs from Think Tank, even though he originally abandoned the recording sessions for this album partway through as he disagreed with the direction that the music was taking. A second greatest hits album, Midlife, was announced, featuring the uber-rare ‘Popscene’ which had never before been released on an album. These small things just rankled with me, as well as contradicting the things that I held most dear about Blur; in particular their strong sense of independence for such a big band, as well as their tendency to avoid the obvious.

Having somehow managed to shy away from the BBC’s Glastonbury coverage, as well as friends’ reviews and videos of the exclusive Goldsmiths’ College and Rough Trade East shows, I went into Friday’s Hyde Park event with a fresh mind. However, I knew that I wanted new material, the weird and the wonderful. I didn’t really want to hear the pompous brass of the slightly cringeworthy ‘Country House’, a song that the band used to make obvious they hated; not even the lacklustre and predictable ‘Song 2’, not anymore. The ‘greatest hits’ set is, of course what we got. Glimmers of the Blur I love shone through in moments like Modern Life Is Rubbish (1992)’s shimmery buzz track ‘Oily Water’, Blur’s ‘Death Of A Party’ and the super-cool ‘Trimm Trabb’, one of the more experimental tracks on 13. The latter is a song that Coxon allegedly disliked but one that he finished at Hyde Park lying on his back, strumming wildly, face scrunched tight. It just seemed a bit too contrived.

The ballads (‘The Universal’, ‘To The End’, ‘Badhead’) were typically beautiful and highlighted the sweet side of Blur that often gets forgotten behind the ‘Parklife’s and the ‘Girls and Boys’s. ‘Beetlebum’ and ‘For Tomorrow’ were spot on, both era-defining and showcasing Blur’s inherent variety. There is no doubting it was a great show but all too often the day felt overly clichéd. Of course, the vast majority of the crowd happily handed over their £50 awaiting an array of classics, but I’d been hoping for something more. When, in the middle of ‘Out Of Time’, the guy behind me said, “Well, they’re no Oasis, are they?” I felt like I was in the wrong place. Seeing a slim Alex James with white T-shirt and perfectly floppy fringe gnawing on a cigarette, looking like he’d just stepped out of a time machine, just underlined the oddity of the whole event.

This unexpected sense of unease only served to be exacerbated by flashing signs on the stage, highlighting that recordings of tonight’s set were now on sale (the final chord of ‘The Universal’ was still ringing). Blur’s Hyde Park got them rave reviews but from a band I’d always classed as innovators, who pushed boundaries without often realising it, it’s disappointing to say that they played the big easy hand.

Coxon hinted to NME earlier this year that “there could be more to come” from Blur, keeping in line with the band’s uniform ‘never say never’ attitude. I hope this is true, as little would please me more than a new Blur record. Nothing was given away at Hyde Park and it’s boggling to consider the roads they could head down now, given all that has passed since Coxon’s estrangement. Albarn’s foray into the realm of digital music with Gorillaz blurred the line between fiction and reality, as animated cartoons performed live with real musicians. His penchant for characterisation with both Blur and Gorillaz acted as a screen for Albarn, whose struggle with celebrity and fame was well-documented.

Don’t get me wrong – it was fabulous to hear some of my favourite songs played live again. It’s just that, after what had gone before, I was hoping for a little more from the second coming and, to me, it failed to properly deliver.

No related posts.

  • http://www.musosguide.com/ Natalie Shaw

    Brilliant read. I've had many of the same thoughts though instead of resorting to the conclusion that I wanted to hear new material at Hyde Park (I don't think I did, at least not there), my parting shot was that I'd have liked to see Blur play for longer.

    This is a ridiculous concept I know, because it would take them the best part of a day to convey their innovation (let alone 17 years, only six short of my existence), but the fact is that now, at a Blur reunion show, on this scale, there was just no way it could have been mindblowing on that level. On the level of wanting them to innovate.

    It's sad, but there's nostalgia for you…

  • http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/ John Mc

    Great piece – really good piece of writing that found really interesting.

    I didn't make it to the Hyde Park shows, but I did see them at Glastonbury, and I thought they were utterly wonderful. You're right; they did play what everyone expected them to, but the way the whole crowd carried on singing 'Tender' after the music had died away will stay with me for a long time.

    I don't think we've seen the end of this one. Not by a long shot. Given the way the reunion has been received – and how much they all seem to have enjoyed it – surely new material is on the way.

    Oh – “they're no Oasis, are they?” Erm, isn't that sort of the point?!

  • http://www.myspace.com/paintingsofships basslady

    Thanks guys. Well, I remember reading an interview with Graham where he said that the band could play the gig tomorrow if they wanted to. I think it came all too easy to them, which is masterful in a way. However, it doesn't seem to fit with Damon to do things simply when there's a worthy challenge out there. They did what they did very very well, but they know they can do better. That's what I was trying to say… I think. I'm still confused about it!

    http://www.twitter.com/basslady

  • thebeardeddragon

    Pop's greatest lesson – big bands are big because so because of 2% of their output. I expect when I went to see Queens Of The Stone Age a few years back and jumped about when No One Knows came on but sat solemnly through the likes of what was probably 3s And 7s or Sick Sick Sick, probably pissing off some die-hard fan behind me whose feet I probably trampled on. In the same vein, people will jump about for Song 2 but smirk through Oily Water and Advert. Still, funnily enough, it was these personally held treasures that you no doubt heard a lot better without 1/20th of a million people chanting along and hurling beer across the skyline. Speaking of, if you're spending festival prices on booze only to chuck it over some girls in summer gear ( it will end up over them, beer like other liquids has a tendency to spill everywhere when it comes into contact with gravity) then you are moron who deserves to be put on house arrest. The rest of the crowd do not share in your purile sad humour.

  • oldyoshi

    What a shame – I just found this website and was enjoying some of the reviews of other bands. However this review of the Hyde Park show is so far off the mark, I don't think I'll bother again. Obviously a bunch of amateurs.
    The fact the reviewer was 10 when Blur came around the first time sort of explains why she would miss the point – in the same way I would never review a sex pistols reunion show – if you weren't there first time round, it'll never be the same. Context for reunion shows is a big element.
    Maybe Catherine when Maximo Park reunite in 15 years time you can give us your candid insights into what they meant for you too.

    Waste of time.

  • http://www.myspace.com/paintingsofships basslady

    I have to say I think that's quite a blinkered view to take.

    So I wasn't around when The Beatles and The Stones first set the world alight – should I not listen to them? What about Shostakovich? I studied his work at university, but then I wasn't persecuted by the Communist government in the 1920s, so my opinions on his work won't be valid, right? The whole issue of authenticity is an interesting one when applied to musical performance, as I have done in my review, but most musicians' common aim is that the music they create will be listened to and discussed by as many people as possible, in both positive or negative ways.

    Yes, I was 10 at the height of Britpop – but does my review not hold more sway when it's considered that Blur are my favourite band, I know their stuff inside out and that they are largely all that I listened to in my formative years? Or would a lite-review by someone who was 25 in 1996 but whose knowledge doesn't span much further than the Greatest Hits be more credible?

    This is precisely why we're in the business of music reviewing. Everyone's opinion is worth something, and the ensuing debate is what it's all about. Thanks for your comments, and I'm glad you enjoyed some of the other stuff on our site.

    C

  • oldyoshi

    Thanks for responding, always good to get into a nice debate.

    I think you misread my post. We all listen to loads of music from the depths of time and of course can be greatly moved by it. My point is that I would not expect to have the same feeling seeing The Beatles, Stones even the Jam as somebody who was really there then – at the gigs, reading the reviews, listening to them on the radio, following every step of their story unfold in real time. I can love the music – but the depth of understanding can't be there.
    I'm sure you love Blur, and I'm glad you have the indepth knowledge of them – to be honest I don't really love them anymore, but again have lived through all the Albums and singles, b-side etc – but it still means something more if you saw them on the Parklife tour or the early shambling events. To then see them re-emerge as conquering hero's was just fantastic.
    Maybe I was too harsh – but my take away message from your review was that they were simply trudging through the hits and that is your perogative. My take away was – how unbelievable is graham's guitar playing; how cool they all still look, and what energy the band still have. When I saw them on the Parklife tour – Damon spent the entire gig bouncing up and down (enhanced artifically, I'm sure) – as a 40 year old man – i thought his energy at HP was excellent.

    So – please don't take it personally – wouldn't it be boring if all the readers agreed with all the reviews? I am happy to continue to read – did you post any other reviews?

    Old Yoshi

  • http://www.myspace.com/paintingsofships basslady

    Thanks.

    I guess it was just another person's opinion. I found this article at a later date which seemed to echo my sentiments: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/culture/neilmccorm… But the majority of reviewers loved it. I disappointed myself that I wasn't completely over the moon!

    Here's another review from the Manchester date: http://musosguide.com/blur-manchester-evening-n

  • oldyoshi

    But againb the reviewer here admits he only 'caught the end of the hyde park show'. Sort of reflects my point that the enjoyment was about anticipation, context and occassion – rather than a critical dissection of the event.

    But hey ho – lets discuss something else. Do you like the new Coxon CD – it is BRILLIANT

Comment on this Article:







Search the site

Custom Search

You might be interested in…

Proud members of…

Handpicked Media

Follow us on Twitter…

Become a fan on Facebook…

A word from our sponsors

NEWSLETTER

We won't spam you, we'll send you a cheerful little newsletter every month with competitions, choice cuts and maybe the odd bit of gossip.

A word from the sponsors… kind of

Join the conversation...

  • Cocobearfly: "however you can’t help wondering how engaging the set would...
  • Cynthiachimkafranklin: I also attended Camden Crawl too, I had a bit of a mixed exp...
  • Banana: I saw Binary, Ghetts, Random Impulse, Two Wounded Birds, Gla...
  • Mr Flowerpot: Get yourfacts right, Batille wre at the Wheelbarrow...
  • Kenny McMurtrie: Great album. Thought it had been out for months but if it qu...
  • Fernadez: I quite like the track and sure it will grow on me, very Kyl...
  • Lan: loving this guy!...
  • Lan: loving this guy!...
  • AdeCMR: I love Death Grips! Can't wait for The Money Store on 4/24!!...
  • Kalie Riemer: This is amazing. Death Grips have exceeded my expectations, ...

You might like these…

Promotional article: The Stones as you’ve never seen them before

From the beaches of Newport in Australia, there’s a new type of crooning cool that’s bound to grace the airwaves this season. Read more